Putting Breaks on Fossil Fuel Exploitation

Are we pragmatic in taking the right steps to preserve the nature while exploiting the energy sources?

Carbon dioxide is considered primarily as the villain in our quest for energy. Two main guzzlers of fossil fuel spitting CO2 are, power generating plants and automobiles.

Though the cleaner nuclear option opened up opportunities to replace fossil fuels for power generation, hiccups for one reason or the other, delayed its large scale induction. Still Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents deter many from considering that choice!

Experience shows that the other greener options, solar, wind and hydro wouldn’t make an impact. Sunlight and wind are inherently unreliable and energy-dilute. This means that at leat 450 times more land and 10 – 15 times more concrete, cement, steel, and glass, are required than for nuclear plants. All of that material throughput results in renewables creating large quantities of waste, much of it toxic. For example, solar panels create 200 – 300 times more hazardous waste than nuclear. Meanwhile, the huge amounts of land has a devastating impact on rare and threatened species — even when solar and wind are at just a small percentage of electricity supplies.

Thus solar and wind are largely unnecessary at best and counterproductive at worst when it comes to combating climate change [1]. Only nuclear scores in realistic terms when it comes in replacing the fossil over dependence. Unless there is a concerted approach to revive nuclear, fossil fuels would continue to have their share of damaging the atmosphere for some more time to come [2,3].

Automobiles are the second largest polluters – would the thrust on electric vehicles or EVs, be at least of a partial relief? Primafacie Electric Vehicles, appear attractive option if the primary source of energy for the grid supply has lesser fossil fuel foot print. Else, the energy efficiency of power plants could negate the benefits of EV in net emission terms. Not just that – there is another environmental burden on EVs – the batteries that supply the energy could ruin the pollution estimates.

The electric cars store energy in large batteries (the larger they are, the bigger their range is) that have high environmental costs. This happens because these batteries are made of rare earth elements like lithium, nickel and cobalt that only exist beneath the surface of the earth and therefore depend on mining activities with very polluting processes [4]. Their extraction process called smelting, emits sulfur oxide and other harmful air pollutants. The water required for producing batteries is about 50 times higher than traditional internal combustion engines. Recycling of used batteries might become efficient enough providing answers for environmental concerns remains to be seen. That’s why asking whether electric cars are net-greener or not, does not come with an easy answer.

EVs would reduce the green house gas emissions of large metros and reduce the pollution levels, at least locally. But for this segment to have a significant impact, power generation and transmission capacities have to be significantly augmented. The energy consumption may be comparable to an Air conditioner or Fridge! But, there only appears to be more excitement and noise than action on the ground [5]. Large scale structural changes need to take place before catering to the needs of significant EV induction!

Are we on track to keep the environment as green as possible? Are we taking the total picture into account or addressing it ‘piecemeal’? are we to take the blame of degrading the earth by tapping the earth profusely, rendering the planet ‘unliveable’! you may have to watch the consequences ‘helplessly’ from the heavens with guilt!

Credits:

1. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2018/05/08/we-dont-need-solar-and-wind-to-save-the-climate-and-its-a-good-thing-too/

2. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26355-z

3. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/blogs/renewable-energy-cant-replace-fossil-fuels

4. https://youtu.be/RFHvq-8np1o

5. https://youtu.be/t50MFchtg5E

Can the Indian Sugar industry ever become ‘Sweet’?

Can the sugar cane cultivation in india be made sustainable? Presently it is in very bad shape – Cost of production of sugar is higher than selling price. Inspite of this, as against the demand of 25 million tonnes per year, because of political brownie points involved, production exceeds 35 million tonnes—a recipe for disaster for farmers and India.

Not just that. India is totally dependent on sugarcane for sugar production, which needs huge amounts of water. Irrigation uses up over 80 per cent of India’s fresh water apart from free electricity that depletes the groundwater.

Options? switch to beet sugar – Using 30 per cent of the water and 30 per cent of the time, sugar beet can give the same output of sugar from the same acreage, compared to sugarcane. In the now freed-up land and water, the farmer is also free to grow what he or she wants. Plus, the additional crops would give profits too.

The downside of beet sugar is that it has an earthy, oxidized aroma and faint burnt-sugar aftertaste, whereas cane sugar is characterized by a sweeter aftertaste and more fruity aroma. So, there could be reluctance for acceptability but it can be managed with appropriate price structure!

The only other impediment for the proposed change in landscape is fear of loss of political patronage by the powerful actors in the sugarcane drama. They don’t see beyond their self interests! See what happened in the reform process?

Any other options: yes. Convert the Indian sugar cane industry into one of biofuel feedstock producer rather than as one for food and beverages. Brazil has a very successful program for over four decades on gasoline blended with ethanol produced from sugar cane. Widespread use of ethanol blended petrol would be beneficial both from the carbon emission as well as from sustainability of the livelihood of agriculturists;

Ethanol can be produced directly from sugar syrup than from molasses which is a byproduct after removing sugar; There is substantial reduction in water requirement if ethanol is directly produced from sugar juice.

This way farmers get remunerative prices; saving of water and electricity; as well of foreign exchange due to reduction in crude imports! Sustainable sugar industry – you can continue to pamper the lobby (Sharad Pawers) without losing sight of Indian economy!

It is high time that sugar cane cultivation gets a relook to secure the future of the Indian economy. Course corrections through major Policy decisions should not only be pragmatic but viable too. After the recent farmers fiasco, would anybody dare to bell the cat?

Credits:

1. https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2019/apr/16/sugar-lobbys-bitter-tactics-hurt-india-1964808.html

2. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/by-using-sugarcane-juice-to-make-biofuels-india-can-make-sugar-more-productive-and-sustainable/articleshow/88763592.cms

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel_in_Brazil

On pollutions and celebrations

Could there be celebrations without noise? Or Without crowding? But, isn’t Silence akin to mourning, the very opposite of celebration? Celebrations have been found to periodically relieve societal tensions and are thus kept always in the altars of civilised human culture from time immemorial. Festivals also have a cascading effect not only on the mental health but also on the economic fabric of the society providing livelihood for many sections of the society, through the short spurt of extravagant spending spree. Would a day or two of celebrations pollute the environment more than the otherwise clumsy day to day city traffic?

Mind you… Throttled up stress could be more devastating to the psychological well being than a polluting day of thunderous and illuminating Diwali. Festivals and rituals have always nourished the complex multi-religious country such as india and kept the society in calm inspite of vast social disparity.

Could even earmarking of the ‘Red light area’ in olden cities, for bartering societal peace with morality, be considered on the same page, though a festival is not such a vice like prostitution!

There could always be a justifiable balance between traditional noisy celebration and the much trumpeted and impressive modern day green and silent (mourning) festivities! So, Don’t throttle the traditional celebrations that have always withstood the test of times!

If you think these reflections could be a culmination of the noise pollution from the now infamous SRK’s CEAT advertisement, you may not be entirely at fault!

Could bank deposits be swept by winds?

Could you lose your deposits in banks by extreme unpredictable weather conditions? Yes! How?

Extreme weather events seem to have become the latest risk to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s renewable energy goal to quadruple solar power generation to 100 gigawatts by 2022. India may further push it to 440 gigawatts of green power by 2030, the country said in its latest forecast this month. This is considered a highly lucrative sector by the venture capitalists in India.

But, Freak climatic conditions are damaging renewable energy projects, threatening a business which survives on wafer-thin margins. For instance, A storm in India’s Rajasthan state, known for its deserts and sunny days, tore through a solar park and blew away modules of various developers. In the adjoining state of Madhya Pradesh, sections of a 750 megawatts project was submerged in 10 feet of water due to unseasonal rains. The design basis of 50-year pattern of water-flow in the area has been found inadequate. It’s not just unpredictable rainfall but also solar radiation in India that can no more be taken for granted. Cloud bursts may not seem to be infrequent after all! On top of it, Over the last 6-8 months radiation has been lower by 4% to 6%, hurting power generation.

The race to bid lower tariffs that has prompted the developers to contain engineering and structural costs with lesser design margins, made them more vulnerable to extreme weather phenomena. The financial sector, which has been betting big on solar power given the number of sunny days the country experiences, is now left worried and calls for innovative financing models.

India’s ambitious plan to take the leadership position among nations as one of largest producers of renewable energy may run into some unfavorable weather.

Investments in green energy may not be ‘green‘. So, be prepared to risk your deposits in banks, as loans to the renewable energy sector companies may turn into non recoverable debts!

Credits:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-16/freak-weather-events-pose-new-risk-to-india-s-renewables-goals

Is ‘Climate Change’ change synonymous with ‘Calamity in Waiting’?

For ‘Doomsayers’, climate change is synonymous with ‘calamity in waiting’. But, It might also make Siberia habitable! Is there really any ‘Upside To Climate Change’? Yes, a research study predicts, ‘Agriculture in Siberia by 2080’, can you believe it? It is the same Siberia with remote winter gulags; To many who are familiar with its climate it is where ‘dissidents’ are (being?) sent to die. The prediction is based on the results of scientific study recently published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

In this study, researchers used climate scenarios set out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, including mild and extreme changes. They combined circulation models with projected climate scenarios, then worked out the January and July temperatures predicted for the Asian Russia region through to the 2080s. This allowed them to work out the habitability potential for humans over the coming decades. Findings showed that January temperatures under severe climate change could increase by over nine degrees Celsius, while July temperatures could go up by almost six degrees Celsius (frightening even to guess what would be the fate of the rest of the inhabited world with similar raise!) Under milder climate change, this could be 3.4 degrees and 1.9 degrees Celsius respectively.

This area which is around five million square miles, is a vast, empty landscape that—despite accounting for 77 percent of Russia’s land area—is occupied by just 27 percent of the population, with an average density of three people per kilometer squared (0.4 square miles.). Much of the land is presently made up of permafrost. Climate change could make a huge part of Russia’s frozen landscape habitable if global warming continues on its current trajectory. This is soil that, in some cases, has been frozen for thousands of years. Should global temperatures increase, this land could thaw making it more suitable for activities such as agriculture.

By examining how Siberia will respond to different warming scenarios, researchers from the Russia’s Krasnoyarsk Federal Research Center, and the U.S. National Institute of Aerospace, were able to determine how much more of the landscape would become suitable for human occupation. Under the extreme climate change, they estimate that permafrost coverage in the region could drop from 65 percent down to 40 percent by the 2080s, vastly expanding the land that could be occupied by humans. Even under mild climate change, they estimate a five-fold increase in the potential human capacity. This positive changes that may come under higher global warming could come with a list of negatives, such as increased natural hazards like droughts, thunderstorms and the problems that come with thawing permafrost, such as damage to infrastructure.

Climate change may not be bad for all, after all!

Credits:

1. https://www.science20.com/news_staff/upside_to_climate_change_it_might_make_siberia_habitable-238625

Organic mania and Farmers’ dilemma

When the news broke that PepsiCo was suing small farmers in India for growing a potato variety that is used in its Lay’s chips, popular sympathies immediately went, of course, to the farmers. National and international pressure swiftly mounted, and in short order a humbled PepsiCo backtracked, announcing its withdrawal of the lawsuit. What should not be a source of pride, however, is the fact that so many small farmers are, like the ones targeted by PepsiCo, reliant, directly or indirectly, on proprietary seeds.

In the current Indian law regulating intellectual property rights in seeds, permits farmers not only to save and resow (multiply) seeds, but also to sell them to other farmers, no matter what the original source of the seeds is. This broad permission (called farmers’ privilege) is considered indispensable for so-called seed sovereignty, Despite the shift away from seed replacement to the right to save seeds, the emphasis remains on proprietary seeds that have narrow, uniform and non-variable genetic builds.

The green revolution in India in the sixty’s focussed on high input (irrigation-fertiliser-pesticide) high yield agriculture apart from research on hybrid seeds. The dividends were palpable as the indian agrarian economy shed its ‘Import’ tag. With the stress on the high yield farming, Indian farmers moved out of traditional farming with home grown seeds that are adept to the local conditions. Many of the crop failures are traced to the poor resistance of the ‘proprietary’ seeds. Even the ill health of the present generation is purportedly believed to be due to the ‘inorganic’ farming with fertilisers and pesticides. Should we go back to our old ways? It is true that the ‘Life has come a full circle’.

The recent spurt in awareness in ‘organic farming’ takes the sheen out of the high cost farming with ‘proprietary’ high yield hybrid seeds. There is a universal consensus for the use of genetically distinctive seeds adapted to local conditions than adapting the local conditions to use genetically standardised seeds. But the traditional farming can’t compete with its lower yield and its lower income even with its high nutritional value, hastening the downward spiralling of the already stressed farm business.

Can India shift now from high-yield to a high-value one, where the values include striving to minimise environmental harm while maximising nutritional gains, at the expense of ‘farmers’ welfare? This ‘organic farming‘ is steadily catching up the imagination of the ‘health cautious‘ minority population who are willing to foot even the high price tag! But could this be sustained? If a biodiversity-rich nation like India can not show the way for sustainable ‘organic farming‘ to the rest of the world, who else will?

Would this call for a rethinking of our agricultural policy? Should organic farming be ‘subsidised‘ for minimising the future expenses on ‘health of the society‘’? Could the productivity be sustained, without the use of chemicals, to feed the growing population? Moot questions to the environmentalists and agriculture scientists!

Credits:

1. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/a-wake-up-call-on-proprietary-seeds/article27072442.ece

Car scrapping would soon become a sustainable industry

Don’t get surprised: scrapping car would no more be left to the lay scrap dealers in Mayapuri or Kurla! Structured approach is in the offing.

Presently, the obsolete vehicles make their way to scrap yards in places such as Mayapuri in New Delhi, Kurla in Mumbai and Shivajinagar in Bengaluru. But the facilities are woefully inadequate considering the size of the emerging numbers. In India there were 8.7 million obsolete vehicles, also called endof-life vehicles (ELVs), in 2015. That figure will increase 2.5 times to 22 million in 2025, given that the average lifespan of a vehicle is 10-15 years.

The scrap-car industry is not only a profitable business venture but it is also a need of the hour for a sustainable environment.

A vehicle has around 3,000 components. Around three-quarters of a vehicle are metals and the rest are plastic, rubber, glass, etc. Valuable parts — like the engine, battery, tyres, wipers and clutch plate — are sold. Steel and plastic scraps are also sold to recyclers of those materials. A lot of these materials can be reused if there is proper salvaging. The auto recycling industry in the US and Canada provides enough steel each year to make nearly 13 million new vehicles.

About 25% of the waste material coming from an ELV poses a potential environmental threat, due to the presence of heavy metals, waste oils, coolants, ozonedepleting substances, etc. Whatever does not find takers is just dumped indiscriminately. The non-functional switches, brake shoes and rubber parts are usually thrown away carelessly — releasing asbestos, mercury and several other pollutants. Liquids like coolant, brake and hydraulic fluids are just drained on the ground. These contaminate groundwater and the air. The government should mandate that every manufacturer sets up one or two recycling facilities with pricing of vehicles encompassing that cost.

The country’s first automated and organised vehicle scrapping and recycling facility is up and running in Greater Noida, a satellite town outside the capital. The unit can scrap and recycle around 500 units a month. The five-acre facility, set up by M&M through a joint venture with government owned company MSTC, went on stream in April this year. Construction of five more facilities at different locations of the country is underway and expected to become operational by March next year.

The government is mulling on a viable and sustainable policy on scrapping; hopefully this would attract many enterprising entrepreneurs considering the size of the market.

Credits to Economic Times:

http://ecoti.in/etapps

Kerala flood havoc and Sanghi’s helping hand

Noted film producer Ali Akbar in his Facebook post writes moving tribute to silent, selfless Sewa Bharati volunteers – ‘Cowdung Sanghis’“

“Some of you who read this may think I write this because I am a BJP man. But many don’t know I was a complete Communist four years ago. But then also I have seen the Sangh’s silent service. When Poonthura riots took place, when my Muslim neighbours deserted the place, it was Sangh cadres who protected my life. Till then I also considered them to be my enemies. Later, when I was putting up in Sasthamangalam, they continued to extend their helping hand, even after realizing that I was a Communist. They never showed any discrimination. Ever since I became close to the Sangh, I got several opportunities to take part in their programmes. I never knew that so much work is being carried out under the banner of the Sangh. For instance, no one knows there is an organisation called Sakshama working for the blind. I have never seen so many orphanages. Without any publicity they all work like a well-oiled machine,” recalls Akbar.

He adds, “What provoked me to pen this down were a few ‘memorable’ scenes in channel reports which showed ‘armies of DYFI men’ alighting buses and ministers inaugurating cleaning work by pouring water… Till yesterday Sewa Bharati workers were cleaning everything including toilets silently…no BJP leader inaugurated their drive… neither did the media discuss it. In the last phase, when DYFI men come in buses, it floods news programmes…now there will be a celebration of selfies… and there will be prime time news bulletins.”

When he asked them, “why don’t you publicise”, the reply was, “This is our duty and dharma. That is not something to be publicized”.

Great disruption in the anvil in transportation sector

How many of us would survive to see a world with cars running without petrol and driver in the not too distant future? Tesla-s is coming with a bang! With this a revolution is on the air!

Global oil consumption would start dropping from 2020! It is predicted that the $10 trillion annual revenues in the existing vehicle and oil supply chains will shrink dramatically.

“We are on the cusp of one of the fastest, deepest, most consequential disruptions of transportation in history,”

But OPEC forecasts a jump in crude consumption by a further 16.4 million barrels a day to 109 million by 2040, with India increasingly taking over from China as growing market. Doomsday prediction indeed!!

Relax, sit back and watch the future, as the landscape would be far different from the one that is today!

Read the following article and Draw your own conclusion on the Armageddon of things on the anvil; sit back and relax…Anyway, I have resolved not to change my ALTO which is more than a decade old with a new one!

Petrol cars will vanish in 8 years, says US report from Stanford economist.

” A Tesla Model S, which has 18 moving parts, one hundred times fewer than a combustion engine car. “Maintenance is essentially zero,” says Stanford University economist Tony Seba. “That is why Tesla is offering infinite-mile warranties. You can drive it to the moon and back and they will still warranty it.”

No more petrol or diesel cars, buses, or trucks will be sold anywhere in the world within eight years. The entire market for land transport will switch to electrification, leading to a collapse of oil prices and the demise of the petroleum industry as we have known it for a century.

This is the futuristic forecast by Stanford University economist Tony Seba. The professor’s report, with the deceptively bland title Rethinking Transportation 2020-2030, has gone viral in green circles and is causing spasms of anxiety in the established industries.

Mr Seba’s premise is that people will stop driving altogether. They will switch en masse to self-drive electric vehicles (EVs) that are 10 times cheaper to run than fossil-based cars, with a near-zero marginal cost of fuel and an expected lifespan of 1 million miles (1.6 million kilometres).

Only nostalgics will cling to the old habit of car ownership. The rest will adapt to vehicles on demand. It will become harder to find a petrol station, spares, or anybody to fix the 2000 moving parts that bedevil the internal combustion engine. Dealers will disappear by 2024.

Cities will ban human drivers once the data confirms how dangerous they can be behind a wheel. This will spread to suburbs, and then beyond. There will be a “mass stranding of existing vehicles”. The value of second-hard cars will plunge. You will have to pay to dispose of your old vehicle.

It is a twin “death spiral” for big oil and big autos, with ugly implications for some big companies on the London Stock Exchange unless they adapt in time.

The long-term price of crude will fall to $US25 a barrel. Most forms of shale and deep-water drilling will no longer be viable. Assets will be stranded. Scotland will forfeit any North Sea bonanza. Russia, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, and Venezuela will be in trouble.

It is an existential threat to Ford, General Motors, and the German car industry. They will face a choice between manufacturing EVs in a brutal low-profit market, or reinventing themselves a self-drive service companies, variants of Uber and Lyft.

They are in the wrong business. The next generation of cars will be “computers on wheels”. Google, Apple, and Foxconn have the disruptive edge, and are going in for the kill. Silicon Valley is where the auto action is, not Detroit, Wolfsburg, or Toyota City.

The shift, according to Mr Seba, is driven by technology, not climate policies. Market forces are bringing it about with a speed and ferocity that governments could never hope to achieve.

“We are on the cusp of one of the fastest, deepest, most consequential disruptions of transportation in history,” Mr Seba said. “Internal combustion engine vehicles will enter a vicious cycle of increasing costs.”

The “tipping point” will arrive over the next two to three years as EV battery ranges surpass 200 miles and electric car prices in the US drop to $US30,000 ($40,600). By 2022, the low-end models will be down to $US20,000. After that, the avalanche will sweep all before it.

“What the cost curve says is that by 2025 all new vehicles will be electric, all new buses, all new cars, all new tractors, all new vans, anything that moves on wheels will be electric, globally,” Mr Seba said.

“Global oil demand will peak at 100 million barrels per day by 2020, dropping to 70 million by 2030.” There will be oil demand for use in the chemical industries, and for aviation, though Nasa and Boeing are working on hybrid-electric aircraft for short-haul passenger flights.

Mr Seba said the residual stock of fossil-based vehicles will take time to clear, but 95 per cent of the miles driven by 2030 in the US will be in autonomous EVs for reasons of costs, convenience, and efficiency. Oil use for road transport will crash from 8 million barrels a day to 1 million.

Insurance costs to fall by 90 per cent

The cost per mile for EVs will be 6.8 cents, rendering petrol cars obsolete. Insurance costs will fall by 90 per cent. The average American household will save $US5600 per year by making the switch. The US government will lose $50 billion a year in fuel taxes. Britain’s exchequer will be hit at the same rate.

“Our research and modelling indicate that the $10 trillion annual revenues in the existing vehicle and oil supply chains will shrink dramatically,” Mr Seba said.

“Certain high-cost countries, companies, and fields will see their oil production entirely wiped out. Exxon-Mobil, Shell and BP could see 40 per cent to 50 per cent of their assets become stranded,” the report said.

These are all large claims, though familiar those on the cutting edge of energy technology. While the professor’s timing may be off by a few years, there is little doubt about the general direction.

China is moving in parallel, pushing for 7 million electric vehicles by 2025, enforced by a minimum quota for “new energy” vehicles that shifts the burden for the switch onto manufacturers. “The trend is irreversible,” said Wang Chuanfu, head of the Chinese electric car producer BYD, backed by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway.

At the same time, global shipping rules are clamping down on dirty high-sulphur oil used in the cargo trade, a move that may lead to widespread use of liquefied natural gas for ship fuel.

This is all happening much faster than Saudi Arabia and Opec had assumed. The cartel’s World Oil Outlook last year dismissed electric vehicles as a fringe curiosity that would make little difference to ever-rising global demand for oil.

It predicted a jump in crude consumption by a further 16.4 million barrels a day to 109 million by 2040, with India increasingly taking over from China as growing market. The cartel said fossils will still make up 77 per cent of global energy use, much like today. It implicitly treated the Paris agreement on climate targets as empty rhetoric.

Whether Opec believes its own claims is doubtful. Saudi Arabia’s actions suggest otherwise. The kingdom is hedging its bets by selling off chunks of the state oil giant Saudi Aramco to fund diversification away from oil.

Opec, Russia, and the oil-exporting states are now caught in a squeeze and will probably be forced to extend output caps into 2018 to stop prices falling. Shale fracking in the US is now so efficient, and rebounding so fast, that it may cap oil prices in a range of $US45 to $US55 until the end of the decade. By then the historic window will be closing.

Experts will argue over Mr Seba’s claims. His broad point is that multiple technological trends are combining in a perfect storm. The simplicity of the EV model is breath-taking. The Tesla S has 18 moving parts, one hundred times fewer than a combustion engine car. “Maintenance is essentially zero. That is why Tesla is offering infinite-mile warranties. You can drive it to the moon and back and they will still warranty it,” Mr Seba said.

Self-drive “vehicles on demand” will be running at much higher levels of daily use than today’s cars and will last for 500,000 to 1 million miles each.

It has long been known that EVs are four times more efficient than petrol or diesel cars, which lose 80 per cent of their power in heat. What changes the equation is the advent of EV models with the acceleration and performance of a Lamborghini costing five or 10 times less to buy, and at least 10 times less to run.

“The electric drive-train is so much more powerful. The gasoline and diesel cars cannot possibly compete,” Mr Seba said. The parallel is what happened to film cameras – and to Kodak – once digital rivals hit the market. It was swift and brutal. “You can’t compete with zero marginal costs,” he said.

The effect is not confined to cars. Trucks will switch in tandem. Over 70 per cent of US haulage routes are already within battery range, and batteries are getting better each year.

EVs will increase US electricity demand by 18 per cent, but that does not imply the need for more capacity. They will draw power at times of peak supply and release it during peak demand. They are themselves a storage reservoir, helping to smooth the effects of intermittent solar and wind, and to absorb excess base-load from power plants.

Mark Carney, the Governor of the Bank England and chairman of Basel’s Financial Stability Board, has repeatedly warned that fossil energy companies are booking assets that can never be burnt under the Paris agreement.

He pointed out last year that it took only a small shift in global demand for coal to bankrupt three of the four largest coal-mining companies in short order. Other seemingly entrenched sectors could be just as vulnerable. He warned of a “Minsky moment”, if we do not prepare in time, where the energy revolution moves so fast that it precipitates a global financial crisis.

The crunch may be coming even sooner than he thought. The Basel Board may have to add the car industry to the mix. There will be losers. Whole countries will spin into crisis. The world’s geopolitical order will be reshaped almost overnight. But humanity as a whole should enjoy an enormous welfare gain.

Elan musk

Elan musk has done an yeoman service to the energy scenario by giving a new direction with the successful commissioning of high capacity storage batteries in southern Australia. I am sure the world would have lesser pollution especially with the adoption of electricity driven vehicles such as Tesla on the roads which is the major source of concern presently. My guilt of having deteriorated the air dooming the health of future generation, has been bailed out to an extent at least.

Doesn’t it feel proud to be a contemporary of this innovative and compulsive engineer. Like Steve jobs who earlier took on the industry majors like IBM head on, Musk is sending tremors in automobile industry with the major players blinking on the bleak prospects of time tested internal combustion engines! Let us wish him success in all his other endeavours as well: space-x and hyperloop…..

On the lighter vein: whether Nostradamus has spelt out the arrival of Musk! An opportunity to interpret the scripture and yell, yes it is….

No projects – Dravidian Dream for Green Tamilnadu

Look at the way Naidu pushes the projects! Neutrino project takes shape in AP….Our NGO is happy that the project is out of Tamil Nadu! VaiKo and other jokers who know nothing of the scientific background on this project has successfully frustrated DAE to move out inspite of 70 crores of wasteful expenditure; DAE has taken the right decision but a hard one, of moving out…Why DAE alone should fritter away their energy in educating public? Is it not the duty of the academia and the media as well…? The scientists have no voice….?

Can political terrorism stall the progress of a scientific project of national Importance and frustrate the researchers? Yes, if one closely analyse the road blocks to the Nutrino Project INO at the Theni site.

Following is a gist of the responses to the concocted myths:

– neutrinos do not present any radiation risk even to the level of the commonly used X-rays or cosmic radiation

– The rock strata has been seismically assessed to be stable during the tunnelling in the construction as well as during its operational phase

– The large electromagnets are not detrimental

– There is no mass denudation of the forests to disturb the flora and fauna

– The Water requirement that will be met from Mullaiperiyar dam is not significant

– There won’t be any restriction for the tribals in paying their daily obeisance to their deity Ambarappar

Now on the befits of neutrino study which is fundamental and futuristic

– Probing the early universe

– Studying the properties of sun

– Study to explore nutrino detectors in imaging for medical purposes

There is a trend for opposing any technological projects in Tamil Nadu, starting with Kudankulam and now INO; primarily to sow the poison seeds in the minds and show the present regime as anti-Tamil. It is an open secret that the opposition for the Kudankulam projects has origins much more sinistral in design than it appeared to be.

As one disgusted scientist put it, ‘if the situation is so vitiated that the deployment of paramilitary forces are required to ensure safety of the facility and the personnel, it is better not to pursue research’

Mu Ka once questioned ‘is Ram an engineer to construct Sethu?’ Taking cue may we ask: Whether Vai Ko, an atomic scientist to say that mullai Periyar dam is at the risk of collapse if neutrino project is implemented in Theni? Whether he is so well informed that even researchers from IISc who allay such apprehensions leave alone the scientists from BARC who wish to pursue the advanced neutrino research?

How can a country prosper if the establishment allows the scientists to be frustrated by illiterates of science and technology?

Checks and balances are required for a developing society; but can it allow vested interests stall projects in the name of NGOs? Those alien nations who wish to fritter away our energy and resources, fuel dissensions through copious unscrupulous funding. There is no end to the story: be it power plants, irrigation dams, etc., in the name of GREEN.

Lallu was quoted as saying in a public meeting to trumpet his concern for rural children: ‘I am against construction of roads.. why? There will be vehicle speeding and your children will get crushed’ so much is his confidence in gullible public… these political terrorists don the attire of erudite and articulate untruths from the rooftops, the scions of knowledge researchers would only seek asylum in hermitages! May be that is what the lobbyists wish to What happened to TATAs in West Bengal! Mamta not only succeeded in getting into power but also in pronouncing the unfriendly industrial policy; No enterprise will dare touch Bengal with even a long stick? Well done Mamta and the (progressive) Bengalis!

If the assistance of state government is not forthcoming no investment should be made from the central government funds henceforth and the fruits of the project, like the share of power produced from the station should be cut to that unfriendly state. the infamous NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) syndrome should be snubbed at all costs.

Handful of people are able to decide (or no decision in case of TN) on the majority of public. Democracy in full cry? Seven decades of progress?