Agree to disagree

A couple of days back, I was provoked into argument in a FB chat about a particular topic that is debated hotly in the political circles. As it was polarised on party lines, the chat turned bizarre where it became one based on ‘judgements and opinions’ rather than on proven ‘facts’. The focus was on being ‘aggressive’ to win over than ‘discuss’. Both the parties knew very well that it will be impossible to score over the other. But then the chat session that started around late in the night prolonged beyond midnight. Neither of us were willing to withdraw honourably unless the other is ‘belittled’. The chat session got closed thanks to the ‘net’ which went down for sometime.

It took quite sometime for me to catch-up with the sleep initially due the ‘unfinished battle’ but later with the regret of late realisation that such arguments were never won as one tends to prove his point ‘by crook or crook’ rather than ‘listen’. Often, it is not the brilliant argument that makes the difference. Sometimes the small act of LISTENING is the GREATEST GIFT we can GIVE.

Is it not foolish to loose one’s sleep over ‘friendly’ chats? Why not agree to disagree?

அமெரிக்க நிறுவனங்களின் அலறல்

RUPAY Card பற்றி சமீபத்தில் அமெரிக்க நிறுவனங்களான Master Card மற்றும் VISA நிறுவனங்கள் புலம்பி இருக்கானுங்க இல்லையா… என்ன தான் பிரச்சனை அவர்களுக்கு?!

இந்திய CARD MARKET பரிவர்த்தனையின் அளவு இன்று சுமார் 9-10 லட்சம்கோடிகள். பொதுவாக பரித்தனைக்குகமிஷனாக இந்த அமெரிக்க நிறுவனங்கள் பெற்று வந்த தொகை சுமார் 3-3.25%. அதாவது குறைந்த அளவில் என கணக்கெடுத்தால் கூட சுமார் 30000 கோடிகள். பெரிதாக எந்த முயற்சியும் இல்லாமல், வங்கிக்கு கமிஷன் போன்றவை போக ஈசியாக 10000-15000 கோடிகளை ஆண்டாண்டாக அள்ளிச் சென்று கொண்டிருந்தன இந்த இரண்டு நிறுவனங்களும்…

இதற்கு ஆப்பு வைத்தார் மோடி. மளமளவென 30 கோடி RUPAY கார்டுகள் மக்களுக்கு வழங்கப்பட்டதன் விளைவாக இன்று 65% பரிவர்த்தனைகள் RUPAY மூலமாக நடக்கத் துவங்கியுள்ளன. RUPAY 2.5% பரிவர்த்தனை கட்டணமும், 0.75% பெட்ரோல்/டீசல் போடுவதற்கு திரும்ப பணம் கொடுப்பது போன்ற செயல்களால் மக்களை கவர்ந்தது.

நாட்டை விட்டு வெளியே சென்று கொண்டிருந்த பணம் உள்நாட்டிலேயே புரளுமாறு ஏற்பாடுகளை செய்தார் மோடி. விளைவு பல ஆண்டுகளாக நம்மை ஏமாற்றி சம்பாதித்து வந்த இரண்டு நிறுவனங்களும் இன்று புலம்பத் துவங்கியுள்ளன…

இந்த மனுஷனை எதிர்க்கறவர்களுக்கெல்லாம் இந்த பொருளாதாரம் கணக்கு தெரிந்தாலும் வெளியே சொல்ல மாட்டார்கள்…

தெரிந்த நாம ஏன் சொல்லாமல் இருக்கனும்…

Skyjacking with congress blessings?

History that has been wiped out from public memory-

On 20 December 1978, two friends Bholanath Pandey and Devendra Pandey hijacked Indian Airlines plane IC 410 ferrying 132 passengers from Lucknow on its way to Delhi.

Their demands ?

The hijackers had two demands –

1. Indira Gandhi, who was jailed after emergency, be immediately released from jail.

2. All cases against Sanjay Gandhi be immediately withdrawn.

What happened to the hijackers ?

1. When Indira Gandhi returned to power in 1980, Bholanath and Devendra Pandey were rewarded with tickets in UP assembly elections. Both won elections.

2. Bholanath Pandey became an MLA from Doaba (Ballia) in 1980 and remained an MLA till 1991.

3. Devendra Pandey also became an MLA in 1980 and was an MLA for 2 terms consecutively.

4. Bholanath Pandey was then rewarded with tickets for Lok Sabha elections as Congress Party candidate for Salempur constituency in 1991, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2004, 2009 and 2014 elections.

.

This is how Congress party treats the criminals who hijacked a plane. But since the plane was hijacked to release Indira Gandhi, the hijackers were made powerful legislators. For Congress, the family has remained above nation, national interest and people.

.

Is there a country in world where plane hijackers are rewarded with tickets for becoming MLAs and MPs ?? Those who put the lives of 132 passengers in danger just to release Indira Gandhi were made MLAs by her. That’s congress Gandhi dynasty….,,

Bequeathing when alive – think twice!

Is bequeathing property to your affectionate offspring when you are still alive, a risky proposition? It seems so if you follow the predicament of Vijaypat Singhania, the 80-year-old, who transformed a small textile business into a household name in India, Raymond Group, that today claims to be the world’s biggest producer of high-quality worsted wool suits.

He would never have thought that he would be thrown out of his palatial house and emeritus status in the billion-dollar textile company when he gifted control of the Raymond Group to his son Gautam three years ago. He repents handing Raymond over to Mr Gautam as “the height of stupidity”.

“I would advise parents everywhere not to make the mistake of giving away all your savings to your children during your lifetime,” said the elder Singhania, an accomplished aviator who in 2005 set the world record for the highest flight in a hot air balloon.

Mr Vijaypat, who says he has not spoken to his son in two years, now plans to test a recent court ruling that allows parents to take back gifted property from their children under a 2007 law if they do not have their basic needs met.

The hard reality of life in this mortal world is when it comes to your very survival, Put your brains before your heart!

TATAS – Holier than thou!

The Indian media is averse to talk about any ‘deemed corruption’ by Ratan Tata, But does not mind indicting Adani or Ambani at the drop of the hat! Is Ratan Tata beyond suspicion? why? Is it because of his philanthropic attire?

Is it like nobody dares sullying MMS of corruption due to the general perception of his being ‘personally clean’ though his whole cabinet was under monumental scandals! Is king not responsible for the wrongdoings if he shuts his eyes to be in power? But somehow no mud sticks though his colleagues bear the brunt! Funny, it looks!

Ratan keeps a similar posture! From a neutral standpoint, the revelation by the ED on the role of Ratan Tata in the Agusta deal needs to be investigated as disposed by Michael during the custodial interrogation. Ratan Tata also deposed in the Italian trial court regarding the fiasco. Somehow due to media management of the Tata Group, Indian media avoided reporting Ratan Tata’s role in the controversy! So much to the neutrality of Indian press!

The story goes like this: Tata Group’s India Rotorcraft was selected as the partner of Agusta in 2010 and the Joint Venture was started in further purchase and assembling of Agusta Helicopter’s other brands in India. The Tata firm was selected after avoiding the public sector undertaking HAL. The then Defence Secretary Vijay Singh was involved in helping Tata who was considered as the approving authority in the Helicopter deal. After retirement, Vijay Singh became a Director of Tata Sons! He would not have deserved his position in the board due to his ‘technical’ capability but might have ‘earned’ it!

The Defence Secretary Vijay Singh’s role in Agusta scam was exposed earlier by industrialist Cyrus Mistry. Now ED has informed the trial court based on the revelations by Michel.

It is a golden rule that ‘Business and Ethics are always inimical to each other’.

Titanium bribegate

Another corruption catch in UPA regime out of the bag?

According to New York Times, the world famous consultancy firm McKinsey has got entangled in a bribery case involving Boeing. Its report became key evidence in a battle over the extradition of the powerful Ukrainian oligarch, Mr. Firtash, charged in a scheme to help Boeing.

In 2006, Desperate for new supplies but with increasing titanium prices, Boeing latched onto a promising lead. A group of six international businessmen with plentiful financing had offered to mine and process five million to 12 million pounds of the metal potentially worth $500 million annually, much of it for sale to Boeing. The group, Bothli Trade A.G., controlled by Mr. Firtash, had already signed a memorandum of understanding for a joint mining venture with the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh.

Boeing turned to McKinsey & Company, the consulting firm with the golden pedigree, purveyor of “best practices” advice to partner with this group. McKinsey says it advised Boeing of the risks of working with the oligarch Mr. Firtash, who had made billions of dollars brokering gas sales to Ukraine from Russia and former Soviet republics, and recommended “character due diligence.”

McKinsey described what it said was the potential partner’s strategy for winning mining permits. It included bribing Indian officials. The mining venture never materialized, but Mr. Firtash was indicted on charges of directing $18.5 million in bribes to Indian officials for mining permits.

McKinsey’s report on Boeing, will now haunt the erstwhile Indian regime of rampant corruption and would engage legal hawks like Dr Subramaniam Swamy, who would champion such cases! Watch out for big news….

Congress was ruling both at the centre and the AP state at the time the Rs 100 crore bribe was paid for getting the mining rights. An Indian official has been indicted (the name is not revealed to the public as the trial by the grand jury was held in camera) who would likely to be requested by US for extradition from india to face the trial along with the Ukrainian oligarch Firtash. When the indian official spills the beans, which top political head in india would roll? This would happen in the lifetime of the present political dispensation as unlike in india, US does not take a long time to pronounce verdicts in courts (though YSR is not alive)!

UPA cupboard is full of skeletons; how does Rahul propose to cover the lid, as his ‘hit and run’ strategy would not bail him out in this case? God only knows!!

Interestingly it is a potential arsenal to BJP, though nothing conclusive would be revealed not before the elections, but plenty of axe to grind and masala to chew that would cause perceptible damage to congress by the ruling dispensation!

Rafale – Part 3: How to milk from Rafale deal – RaGa’s game plan

If you want status quo on policies that would bring in transparency and keep the middleman at bay, what can be done? stir controversies during election season and repeatedly talk loudly about illusory mega-scams to frustrate those making changes! Opposition follows in both letter and spirit what Hitler once wrote in his biography ‘Mein Kamph’ ‘the most brilliant propagandist technique is one that confines it to a few points and repeat over and over – even a blatant lie would take the hue of gospel truth’!

The government is forced to be on its back foot and played safe. What has taken the hit? Defence sector make-in-India policy is still in draft stage! The defence output from the proposed defence corridors in UP and TN would not pickup the way one wishes it to be!

Hit by the Rafale controversy, the defence ministry has not moved to amend its offsets policy since May this year, when a draft was presented for comments. A new defence production policy that was promised in 2018 has also met a similar fate, with limited forward movement since the draft was issued in March. Potentially huge foreign investments especially for meeting offset conditions, are in suspended animation due to non-finalisation of these policies.

The extremely cautious bureaucratic approach in finalising the draft involving all the stake holders, in this potentially lucrative defence sector, is understandable. The ‘house of defence manufacturing & procurement’ is infested with lot of cob webs and well fed rats, requiring ‘sweeping’ changes if the targets have to be met…. but a golden opportunity is not to be missed…..!

இந்து மதத்தின் முரண்பாடுகள் அதன் பலமா, பலவீனமா?

இந்து மதத்தின் முரண்பாடுகள் அதன் பலமா, பலவீனமா? நம் இதிகாச புராணங்களின் சில நாயக நாயகிகளை அணுகும் முறைகளை அலசும் போது என் எண்ண அலைகள் கடிவாளமின்றி கட்டுப்பாடுகளை இழந்ததன் வெளிப்பாடுதான் இந்த பதிவு:

தந்தையின் சொல்லுக்கு பணிந்ததால் உயர்ந்தவன் ராமன் என்றால் தந்தையின் வார்த்தைகளை மீறி அவன் உயிரிழக்க காரணமான ப்ரகலாதன் ஏன் போற்றப்பட வேண்டும்?

கணவனை வணங்கி அவனுடன் வனவாசம் செய்த சீதை உயர்ந்தவளானால், கணவனை மீறியும் மீரா ஏன் புகழப்படுகிறாள்?

அண்ணன் செய்த தவறைத்தாங்க முடியாது தர்மத்தை மனதில் கொண்டு எதிர்அணியில் சேர்ந்த த்ரோகி விபீஷணனை விடவும், தவற்றை சுற்றிக்காட்டியும் திருத்தாத அண்ணனின் ஆணைக்கு பணிந்து அவனுக்கு முன் அவனுக்காக உயிர் துறந்த கும்பகர்ணன் எந்த விதத்தில் தாழ்ந்தவன்?

தர்மம், சூழ்நிலைக்குத் தக்கவாறு மாற்றிக்கொள்ளப்பட்டால், சந்தர்ப்ப வாதத்துக்கு வழிவிட்ட பழிக்கு ஆளாகாதோ? இந்து இதிகாச புராணங்களில் இவ்வகை முரண்பாடுகள் நிறைந்து காணப்படுவது, நம் வாழ்க்கை நடைமுறையைப் பிரதிபலிக்கும் யதார்த்தமோ? அது தான் பலம் என்று கூறினால், தர்மம் என்பது எடுப்பார் கைப்பிள்ளையோ?

GST – A game changer in Modi’s regime

The trials and tribulations of 18 months since GST has been rolled out, have been smothered to a large extent. The change over to the new taxation system, not unexpectedly, was not without hurdles and heartburns for the stakeholders. But now, By and large, the goods producer/retailer/service provider, consumer and the government, are a contended lot though there are still expectations. For Most of the items now the taxes are much lower than that in the original indirect multiple tax regime. It is to be noted that with lower tax rates in the new regime, the collection is largely revenue neutral, due to wider base and better compliance.

Those who proclaimed this as the ‘Gabbar Singh Tax’ at the peak of the troubled induction period, shamelessly have to eat their own words and profess that the ‘baby is after all theirs’ which they were about to introduce anyway in their term! Don’t you recall the same voice which once promised that ‘we would withdraw GST if we are voted back to power’!!

Politics apart, the country has benefitted due to this single taxation system with no interstate check points, steady raise in tax compliance, no frequent visits by the ever ‘milking’ famous local sales-taxmen!

Moral of the story: India is capable of bringing change in the way business is done even with its large landscape and a federal system run largely by hawkish and ‘starving’ politicians. It is a wonder that even the inertia of the bureaucracy can be converted to a well oiled machinery by the cyber technology! But, to enable this to happen, A strong visionary governance is required to implement policies that would bring prosperity to the people in the long run; but not by those who take populist knee-jerk decisions with a focus to corner the ‘vote bank’…

Modern Economics

Let us laugh it out

Mary is the proprietor of a bar. She realizes that virtually all of her customers are unemployed alcoholics and as such, can no longer afford to patronise her bar

To solve this problem, she comes up with a new marketing plan that allows her customers to drink now, but pay later. She keeps track of the drinks consumed on a ledger (thereby granting the customers loans)

Word gets around about Mary’s “drink now, pay later” marketing strategy and as a result, increasing numbers of customers flood into Mary’s bar. Soon she has the largest sales volume for any bar in the area.

By providing her customers’ freedom from immediate payment demands, Mary gets no resistance when, at regular intervals, she substantially increases her prices for wine and beer, the most consumed beverages. Consequently, Mary’s gross sales volume increases massively

A young and dynamic vice-president at the local bank recognises that these customer debts constitute valuable future assets and increases Mary’s borrowing limit. He sees no reason for any undue concern, since he has the debts of the unemployed alcoholics as collateral

At the bank’s corporate headquarters, expert traders figure a way to make huge commissions and transform these customer loans into DRINKBONDS, ALKIBONDS and PUKEBONDS. These securities are then bundled and traded on international security markets. Naive investors don’t really understand that the securities being sold to them as AAA secured bonds are really the debts of unemployed alcoholics. Nevertheless, the bond prices continuously climb, and the securities soon become the hottest-selling items for some of the nation’s leading brokerage houses

One day, even though the bond prices are still climbing, a risk manager at the original local bank decides that the time has come to demand payment on the debts incurred by the drinkers at Mary’s bar. He so informs Mary

Mary then demands payment from her alcoholic patrons, but being unemployed alcoholics they cannot pay back their drinking debts. Since, Mary cannot fulfil her loan obligations she is forced into bankruptcy. The bar closes and the eleven employees lose their jobs

Overnight, DRINKBONDS, ALKIBONDS and PUKEBONDS drop in price by 90%. The collapsed bond asset value destroys the banks liquidity and prevents it from issuing new loans, thus freezing credit and economic activity in the community

The suppliers of Mary’s bar had granted her generous payment extensions and had invested their firms’ pension funds in the various BOND securities. They find they are now faced with having to write off her bad debt and with losing over 90% of the presumed value of the bonds

Her wine supplier also claims bankruptcy, closing the doors on a family business that had endured for three generations, her beer supplier is taken over by a competitor, who immediately closes the local plant and lays off 150 workers

Fortunately though, the bank, the brokerage houses and their respective executives are saved and bailed out by a multi-billion no-strings attached cash infusion from their cronies in Government. The funds required for this bailout are obtained by new taxes levied on employed, middle-class who have never been in Mary’s bar.

Now, you know – Economics