Would terror tactics succeed in a civilised world?
Can a small fly take a revenge to destroy a crafty antique chinaware store? Yes, if It can locate a bull loitering near the shop; just enter its ears! Terrorists are after all only flies, but they can irritate a nation to react violently! The casualties of terrorism (all types included) are in minuscule numbers compared to even traffic accidents. It does not decapitate the enemy of either its personnel or ammunitions as in a war encounter; the casualties are mostly white collar office goers and street venders! But then why bother?
While no government is penalised by its citizens for large scale casualties in natural calamities, those in power could be dethroned even if there is a single terror attack! Like the irritating thunderous noise a stone can make in an empty jar, people aver ineffective protection of their peace. USA was compelled to take several military actions in Middle East as a retaliation against terror attack on Sep 11, 2001. After a number of casualties in several ‘theatres’ spreading over a decade, the ‘fly’ was killed in Pakistan on 2nd May 2011.
The acts of Terrorism is a wish to provoke the otherwise calm and peace loving nations to use their force indiscriminately and get sympathy from ’civilised’ world for occasional mistakes in the campaign. Have the terrorists succeeded? Terrorists do get sympathy from a large section of ‘unaffected’ in the society!
It is a dilemma for the peace loving nations, to act to not to act. It is impossible to ensure complete protection to its vast population in an era of globalisation against terrorism, even with advanced gadgets and tactical espionage! Also, terrorism can’t be stopped by indiscriminate use of power against a faceless foe either, though ‘surgical strikes’ might help even though there would be some whispers against.
While turning a blind eye to the vandalism is an alternative, facing the wrath of its citizens would be a heavy storm to weather for those in power. Can the next generation resist getting panicky? Avoiding knee jerk reaction seems to be the only way out for a society that can successfully put up against the onslaught of terrorism. Of course technology would come handy for surveillance and prevention. Only then the ‘sinister flies’ can be defeated!
Stonehenge, that many of us might have been familiar only as our windows desktop screen saver, is a monstrous monument built by prehistoric stone men in the plains of south-west England. What is imposing is the megalithic structure has many stones weighing 7 to 50 tons, that have been pulled from quarries some 230 miles away, by hundreds of workers, rafted over waterways, shaped and finished without any metal implements, over a period of around 800 years, probably between 2400-1600 BC. How the lintels weighing over 7 tons in the ‘trilithons’ have been lifted to a height of around 20 feet for placement exactly over the two upright tower stones and positioned in the dovels, in those days without a ‘ramp’ is indeed an engineering marvel! It is estimated that perhaps 1,500,000 man-days might have been involved in the construction, apart from the time of designers, whose capabilities are comparable to that of Newton-Einstein caliber! ‘The Great Pyramid of Cheops’ of Egypt which was completed in 2560 BC, also has one of the heaviest stone weighing over 15 tons, atop 400 ft, but a gentle slope would have enabled its easy raise to the top! Locating an 80 ton stone at a height of 216 ft at the South Indian temple at Tanjore is again no mean feat but considering the tools and shackles and the construction knowledge that could have been available in 1010 AD, one would not be awe struck as with Stonehenge.