Tryst with Death

How would you like to die?

Does the word ‘death’ not send tremors to most of us? Since time immemorial, man would strive to do anything to ward off death – be it ‘a magic potion – elixir of life’ or religious rites to please the god of death. Rig Veda advocates a prayer to Lord Shiva – mrithyanjaya mantra, that can protect one from death. It is believed to stop premature deaths, or at best ward off the fear of death! There are citations in epics where Lord Shiva himself revealed this mantra to his disciples: Markandeya, sukrachaya and Rishi Vasishta. One who does not die is called a Chiranjeevi. There are six more Chiranjeevis as per Hindu mythology: Hanuman, Parashurama, Vibhushan, Aswathama, Mahabali and Kripacharya. Though ‘chranjeevi’, lives for ever, one can consider himself so, after having lived for over a hundred years in the present day of evolutionary autonomy coupled with progress in various facets of medical field. The life expectancy otherwise being a little over 70 years in most of the developed societies of the world.

Is living that long a boon or bane?

As people age, they are much more likely to develop degenerative conditions that could lead to a lower quality of life. Crucially, strategies to promote healthy ageing may not only ease the burdens on society, but help to ensure that our longer lives are better lives – even in a philosophical sense. As the population continues to age, we will need to make important and potentially difficult choices about how we want to care for the elderly. Sometimes it might be better for us to die earlier than we otherwise might have, if doing so is more consistent with the “life story” we wanted for ourselves – for example, being active and independent throughout our lives. Else life then becomes a pain rather than pleasurable. But even then, the very thought of Death is scaring – as dying is not easy.

But terminally ill also may dwell on such thoughts!

Though the impact of sudden death is terrible, it is extremely painful to watch the sufferings of terminal ills. More so to the kith and kin. Even the philosophically balanced person would be extremely disturbed if the ‘expiry date’ is known! For example those who are terminally ill, their days are counted but not sure whether it is months or years. In such cases, the life expectancy statistics are just numbers that are not useful to those suffering. Oncologists are often reluctant to discuss life-expectancy estimates with their patients because of concerns about their inaccuracy and limited evidence regarding benefits. Those are really blessed who do not know the ‘secret’ – ignorance is bliss!

Though there were several writers who wrote about the mental tribulations of the kith and kins when the ‘death’ was at the doorstep, the recent one by Dr Paul Kalanidhi, ‘while breath becomes air’ depicts the resolution to face the reality with determination and grace! After years of hard work, when he was about to reach his cherished goal of qualified neurosurgeon, he was struck with lung cancer. In this book, written in his twilight years of less than two years from the knowledge of his impending death, he beautifully depicts the mental tribulations of all close to him, most of them doctors in their own right. With so much of plans to accomplish in life, when death suddenly stares at him, he and his wife settle down to face the reality and plan for the small ‘left over’ life. It needs immense guts to live the ‘remnant’ life with grit.

On the other hand, sudden death, say due to massive heart attack or by an accident, though is extremely painful, is on an entirely different plane, compared to the slow death.

Coming to the life of ‘non-Chiranjeevis’, the normal mortals – most of them age ‘gracefully’. As one ages the expectations of ‘left over’ remnant life depends on the quality of life or the their present status of health. The wish reduces – accordingly one plans ‘the future’ – in sixties it may be for a decade at best, while in nineties, even if you wake up healthy, you should be happy – you live for the day! One should be aware of fragility of life, though! I am not talking of life of ‘real chiranjeevis’ living after scoring a century.

Think of the plight of terminally ill patients, when the doctor first pronounces the prognosis. They invariably utter – ‘God, why me? What have I done for the hell to befall on me?’. But the fact of life is, if such thing can happen to anybody, then why not you. There are diseases with extremely rare even in productive age group who are commonly with robust health – But it is not absolute zero occurrence. How many can simply accept that as one’s fate? Yes, it is a fact that all are mortals, but knowing when you are going to die or the death is not far away, is extremely sickening! The fateful day being a secret to many, is indeed a blessing in disguise!

Even if you have not sinned, you may not be totally risk free! The oft quoted adages like வினை விதைத்தவன் வினை அறுப்பான், as you sow so you reap, is to keep the morally weak not to sin. But in day to day life, do you really see its happening that way? No. One sows for others to reap! The adage is pronounced only to heal your afflicted wounds – to curse others who are harming – to vent out your helplessness!

I am amazed at our elders often putting a prefix while pronouncing any plans – ‘பொழைச்சுக்கிடந்தா நாளைக்கு ஊருக்கு போகலாம்’! This roughly translates to ‘will go to town, if at all we are alive’ – what a prophetic statement? They have understood that life is uncertain. If at all one plans, be certain that there would be ‘uncertainty that can’t be planned’!

In the Indian epic ‘Mahabharata’, there comes an encounter with ‘yaksha’. The eldest of the Pandavas is asked by the yaksha several questions and one of them is on this present topic – ‘who is the most ignorant fool?’ Dharmaraj answers ‘those who think they would not be dying even after being witness to many of the deaths around’! This phenomenon called ‘death’ could not have been philosophically explained better!

But taking the life as it is even while being terminally ill and suffer in silence, require moral strength which only a few possess. King Parikshit on knowing he is left with only a week to live, listened to ‘Bhagavatham’ for a blissful demise!

தேர்ந்த ஆன்மீகவாதிகள் நாளையும் நேரத்தையும் குறித்து கொடுத்துவிட்டு அந்த நாளில் சமாதி அடைவதாக கேள்விப்படுகிறோம். அது அவர்கள் தவத்தினால் கிடைத்த வரம். அது போல் எதுவும் அறியாதவர்களுக்கு மரணகாலத்தை மறைத்து வைப்பது இறைவன் கொடுப்பினை.
அதுவும் இருக்கும்வரை (ஓரளவுக்காவது) பிறருக்கு துன்பம் தராமல் இருப்பதும் கொடுப்பினை. அது இயற்கையாக நிகழ்வதும் கொடுப்பினை. நோய் என்று வந்து வாழ்கையே சுமை என்னும்போது மரணமே கொடுப்பினை. அனைத்துக்கும் ஆண்டவன் அருள் வேண்டும்.

Is there any other way to get mental peace for ‘agnostics’ in this predicament?

Two Giant Indian (namesake) Scholars of ancient heritage

Two namesakes who left indelible mark in their own right: One is Bhaskaracharya and another is Bhaskararaya.

Bhaskaracharya (Bhaskara II) was born in a family of scholars, mathematicians and astronomers, was the leader of a cosmic observatory at Ujjain, the main mathematical centre of ancient India. Bhāskara and his works represent a significant contribution to mathematical and astronomical knowledge in the 12th century. He has been called the greatest mathematician of medieval India. His main work Siddhānta-Śiromani, for “Crown of Treatises” is divided into four parts called Līlāvatī, Bījagaṇita, Grahagaṇita and Golādhyāya, which are also sometimes considered four independent works. These four sections deal with arithmetic, algebra, mathematics of the planets, and spheres respectively. He also wrote another treatise named Karaṇā Kautūhala.

Bhāskara’s work on calculus predates Newton and Leibniz by over half a millennium. He is particularly known in the discovery of the principles of differential calculus and its application to astronomical problems and computations. While Newton and Leibniz have been credited with differential and integral calculus, there is strong evidence to suggest that Bhāskara was a pioneer in some of the principles of differential calculus. He was perhaps the first to conceive the differential coefficient and differential calculus. His book on arithmetic is the source of interesting legends that assert that it was written for his daughter, Lilavati.

There is an interesting anecdote- Bhaskara II studied Lilavati’s horoscope and predicted that she would remain both childless and unmarried. To avoid this fate, he ascertained an auspicious moment for his daughter’s wedding and to alert his daughter at the correct time, he placed a cup with a small hole at the bottom of a vessel filled with water, arranged so that the cup would sink at the beginning of the propitious hour. He put the device in a room with a warning to Lilavati to not go near it. In her curiosity though, she went to look at the device and a pearl from her bridal dress accidentally dropped into it, thus upsetting it. The auspicious moment for the wedding thus passed unnoticed leaving a devastated Bhaskara II. It is then that he promised his daughter to write a book in her name, one that would remain till the end of time as a good name is akin to a second life. Lilavati, later emulated her father and specialised in the same subjects.

The other great giant is the 17th century (1690–1785) Bhaskararaya. He is widely considered an authority on all questions pertaining to the worship of the Mother Goddess in Shaktism/Hinduism. He was born in Hyderabad, Telangana, was welcomed by king Serfoji II of Bhonsle dynasty in South India, and thereupon he settled in Tamil Nadu.

Bhaskararaya is the attributed author of more than 40 and range from Vedanta to poems of devotion and from Indian logic and Sanskrit grammar to the studies of Tantra. Several of his texts are considered particularly notable to the Shaktism tradition, one focussed on the Mother Goddess:

• Commentary on Tripura Upanishad and Bhavana Upanishad

• Commentary on Devi Mahatmya, titled Guptavati. Bhaskararaya, in his Guptavati, offers comments on 224 out of the 579 verses of the Devi Mahatmya.

• Varivasya Rahasya, is a commentary on Sri Vidya mantra and worship. The Varivasya Rahasya contains 167 ślokas numbered consecutively. It has an accompanying commentary entitled “Prakāśa“, also by Bhaskararaya.

• Setubandha is a technical treatise on Tantric practice. It is his magnum opus. It is a commentary on a portion of the Vāmakeśvara-tantra dealing with the external and internal worship of Tripura Sundari.

• “Soubhāgyabhāskara“is a commentary (bhāsya) on Lalita Sahasranama.

• His Khadyota (“Firefly”) commentary on the Ganesha Sahasranama is considered authoritative by Ganapatya.

There is another interesting anecdote attributed to this Bhaskararaaya…

In Rameswaram jyotirlinga temple, many people argued that main Lingam of the temple was not made of sand and also said that if Lingam was made of sand it would have been dissolved while anointing the Lord.

During that time, Bhaskararaaya made a Lingam out of salt and anointed it. But the Lingam did not dissolve. He said that if the Lingam made by him who worship Devi Parvati did not dissolve, then it is of no wonder that the Lingam made by the wife of Lord Vishnu is not dissolved yet. The salt Lingam made by him is present even now behind the main Lingam of the temple. Even after many years, the salt Lingam also has not yet dissolved like the main ‘sand’ lingam!

The stories attributed to these two Indian giants are indeed very interesting, though curious to the scientifically oriented.

Is making hay while it shines, unethical?

So much is talked about pharma giants making ‘a kill’ in the pandemic ‘tsunami’. Is it immoral? Who is competent to decide what is morality in the first place? Anybody could have done the needed research and found the elixir! It is a free world. At the beginning of the game itself it is known the winner would take it all. They have won and get their fair return for their success. Period.

There is shrill cry that though the pharma companies have got state funding for the research, the price of the vaccines which are products of the research, is disproportionately high. But, after all, the state also knows it is betting on a winning horse; it has in fact tied (unethically) all the supplies on priority exclusively for its own use. Any other tags could also have been tied to the recipient of the grant.. but having agreed, now crying foul is anarchism.

One would then argue that in any State sponsored research, the fruits of the efforts should accrue to the society since it is public money. But, ethically, to promote research state should fund such researches in public interest without tying the funding for its own benefit. After all the knowledge generated is not the exclusive domain of the state but of the scientists whose free will play a major role. Even then, the state in its wisdom desires to stake a claim, it is free to incorporate such a clause in the contract while awarding the grant. If not, there is no binding. Play as per rules of the game – don’t change rules retrospectively just because you are empowered! But be a referee and ensure fair playing field.

Should in all state funded research programs, state must have a share? Can the public rightfully demand a stake always in the product, even without such a contractual binding? It is akin to binding all the students graduated as subordinates to the state as they have indirectly got the state funding! What would be the responsibility of those who graduate with state scholarship? To what extent are they subordinate to the state?

This sort of allegations of exploitation, making huge profits and demands to cut down the price, throttle motivation to innovate in scientific arena where the success rates are low and opportunity costs are the norms! Who pays for failed research anyway? If the vaccines had fizzled out, would the market even whisper? No way….

Compared to the US model of Pfizer, Moderna funding or UK’s Astra Zeneca for that matter, is far different from that of India’s handholding strategy at every step of the development of vaccine: Covaxin is a Codeveloped product with the public-private cooperation. Covishield production capacity was funded with advance purchase agreements. These models largely helped in keeping the prices in check and affordable. The agreements are transparent compared to that of Pfizer’s! Why the west succumbed to the conditions of contract, the terms were kept secret, could be due to the eagerness of securing the scarce supplies on priority, ‘at any cost’, in common parlance. Now, on looking back, the west might contemplate on the unnecessary urgency and the trap it fell into. But that is a different story altogether. They have missed the bus!

Arm twisting the companies at this point of time, citing their profit margins, is unethical. At best, you take it or leave it at your peril. These strategies get support only with those having ‘collectivist’ mindset: only a few would toil to generate knowledge and wealth while every one in the society would share equally. This communist philosophy cannot sustain.

Don’t expect a free lunch without a sweat!

Science-ethics dichotomy

Many of the scientists who were architects of the Manhattan Project, including the one who headed the program to make the deadly weapon of mass destruction, Robert J Oppenheimer, never dreamt its immense potential. But were positive it would win them war. Yes, it won the war but nevertheless caused immense loss of life. They were pained to see that it actually become part of the world’s most deadly military arsenal. The only motivation and dedication of many scientists in the project was the mortal fear of nazi Germany Hitler’s win in the ongoing Second World War as German scientists were also working on a similar pursuit; they would have preferred it, may be more as a deterrent, than as a regular military arsenal! After all most of the scientists love humanity! Most of them returned to academia – never wanted to continue the exciting research.

The conscious, self upright, The Times’ man of the year, Oppenheimer met the then American president to dissuade him from pursuing the more deadly H-Bomb told, “I feel I have blood on my hands”. This was unacceptable to Truman, who retorted, “that was no concern of Oppenheimer’s, and that if anyone had bloody hands, it was the president”. The politicians primarily averse to communist Russia taking a lead did not want to derail the H-bomb project; eventually they succeeded in indicting the much acclaimed scientist – he was pronounced not trust worthy anymore with state’s nuclear secrets! Oppenheimer, who has had in his head for years every secret about the atomic bomb and even discovered some of them, was tagged “untrustworthy”! It is to the politicians, who had no iota of this knowledge, that science was pledged! Oppenheimer lost the battle and died a lunatic! The country realised the insults to this extraordinary man much later after his death, corrected the historical blunder and restored his lost glory, is a different story!

Could a scientist destroy the knowledge that he has created, if driven to its being wrongly exploited? Howard Roark, the fictional architect envisioned by Ayn Rand in The Fountainhead, defends his right to dynamite a building, his own creation, because it wasn’t made the way he wanted. “I destroyed it because I did not choose to let it exist,” declares Roark. At best, this is like a kid throwing a tantrum and smashing his toy blocks. At worst, it’s terrorism masquerading as free speech. Does scientist have such a liberty?

Can a professional soldier accept a job with Murder, Inc. and claim he is merely practicing his trade, that it is not his responsibility to know for what his services being used? Would the predicament of the scientist be same as that of ‘that soldier’? What should a scientist do, if he comes to know that his knowledge is being exploited by the powers that be? Does he have the right to destroy the knowledge?

There could be many examples where self conscious scientists could be at logger heads with their own conscience. Let me assure you that this narrative is not to bring out any similarity to the controversial genetic experiments in the Wuhan lab by the ‘bat lady’ with possible CDC funding! Or the scientists, who pioneered the mRNA vaccines to defeat the virus, could feel guilty of windfall gains that their corporates are making, repenting a little on their being out of reach to many poor nations!

No doubt science has won many a wars in the recent centuries, but it has been defeated in the ethical battle, hands down!

Shunning Mask for Self Esteem

Inherent human nature is self esteem that gets expressed in revolts at the slightest semblance of violation. Self esteem and independence are synonymous. But a social order, especially in larger population, demands calibrated curtailment for larger interest. When this compromise exceeds limits, it results in revolts. Such a behaviour is not uncommon in adolescents, family, religions, ethnic groups and even at the level of countries. Sermons by heads of families, leaders of the nation, and priests of religions could psychologically condition to surrender independence for larger good, but can’t sustain long as it is contrary to the very human nature. Only self esteem aka independence, bring true happiness to the individual and ultimately to all in the society.

But larger societies call for organisation for order and stability that would be at some cost to individual freedom. Religions are known to play a role in persuading individual to willingly surrender self esteem through psychological conditioning? It is welcome, as long as religious passion does not violate others’ freedom! Could a government also convince a similar surrender? Yes, by invoking nationalism. Be it religion or government, restraining individual liberty is inevitable in the larger interest!

But, invoking and harnessing mass hysteria either by religious fanaticism or through patriotic nationalism, is a tough proposition and could evolve as a Frankenstein, that would be difficult to contain even by the creators! This might do well in fits and starts, during times of calamity or war, but never as a long term strategy. Why? Because it calls for surrendering individual liberty which is against human nature!

Which would bring peace and happiness in the society, prosperity through wealth or self esteem? It would be interesting to find out, who is more happy – one in China or the one in USA? They are poles apart in individual liberty and freedom, but seemingly both are prosperous occupying the top two positions in world GDP! Or the one in the lower rungs of GDP, India, where, the individual is largely independent but yet, not prosperous enough! There are gapping disparities and poverty pervading across the spectrum of the society, but yet there is freedom of every kind!

Why do the liberal west, rebel covid lockdowns and curfews, while those in India, largely accept but with a murmur! Does prosperity entitle one to have more self esteem? In less prosperous democratic republics, that guarantees freedom and liberty, one is penalised for having self esteem, “for violating covid protocols”!

China will be silent anyway, as no one would dare open the mouth, lest be silenced for eternity!

Self esteem in humans is a premium product – nurture with care!

Can the Indian Sugar industry ever become ‘Sweet’?

Can the sugar cane cultivation in india be made sustainable? Presently it is in very bad shape – Cost of production of sugar is higher than selling price. Inspite of this, as against the demand of 25 million tonnes per year, because of political brownie points involved, production exceeds 35 million tonnes—a recipe for disaster for farmers and India.

Not just that. India is totally dependent on sugarcane for sugar production, which needs huge amounts of water. Irrigation uses up over 80 per cent of India’s fresh water apart from free electricity that depletes the groundwater.

Options? switch to beet sugar – Using 30 per cent of the water and 30 per cent of the time, sugar beet can give the same output of sugar from the same acreage, compared to sugarcane. In the now freed-up land and water, the farmer is also free to grow what he or she wants. Plus, the additional crops would give profits too.

The downside of beet sugar is that it has an earthy, oxidized aroma and faint burnt-sugar aftertaste, whereas cane sugar is characterized by a sweeter aftertaste and more fruity aroma. So, there could be reluctance for acceptability but it can be managed with appropriate price structure!

The only other impediment for the proposed change in landscape is fear of loss of political patronage by the powerful actors in the sugarcane drama. They don’t see beyond their self interests! See what happened in the reform process?

Any other options: yes. Convert the Indian sugar cane industry into one of biofuel feedstock producer rather than as one for food and beverages. Brazil has a very successful program for over four decades on gasoline blended with ethanol produced from sugar cane. Widespread use of ethanol blended petrol would be beneficial both from the carbon emission as well as from sustainability of the livelihood of agriculturists;

Ethanol can be produced directly from sugar syrup than from molasses which is a byproduct after removing sugar; There is substantial reduction in water requirement if ethanol is directly produced from sugar juice.

This way farmers get remunerative prices; saving of water and electricity; as well of foreign exchange due to reduction in crude imports! Sustainable sugar industry – you can continue to pamper the lobby (Sharad Pawers) without losing sight of Indian economy!

It is high time that sugar cane cultivation gets a relook to secure the future of the Indian economy. Course corrections through major Policy decisions should not only be pragmatic but viable too. After the recent farmers fiasco, would anybody dare to bell the cat?

Credits:

1. https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2019/apr/16/sugar-lobbys-bitter-tactics-hurt-india-1964808.html

2. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/by-using-sugarcane-juice-to-make-biofuels-india-can-make-sugar-more-productive-and-sustainable/articleshow/88763592.cms

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel_in_Brazil

மாணிக்கத்திலும் மரகத்திலும் தெய்வங்கள்

கண்களுக்கு உவகை அளிக்கும் வண்ணவண்ண நவரத்தினங்களை அணிகலனாக வடிவமைத்து அணிவது காலம் தொட்டு வந்த வழக்கம். முத்து (Pearl), வைரம் (Diamond), வைடூரியம் (Lapis Lazuli; Cat’s Eye), மாணிக்கம் (Ruby), நீலம் (Blue Sapphire), மரகதம் (Emerald), புஷ்பராகம்(Yellow Sapphire; Topaz), பவளம் (Coral), கோமேதகம் (Hessonite) ஆகியவை நவரத்தினங்களாக கருதப்படுகின்றன. கடலடியிலும், மலைப்பாறைகளிலிருந்தும் இயற்கையாக மட்டுமே கிடைக்கும் இவைகளை ஒரு காலகட்டத்தில் நவகிரகங்களுடன் சம்பந்தப்படுத்தப்பட்டு குறிப்பிட்ட சிலநோய்களைத்தீர்க்கும் குணங்களும் உண்டு என்ற நம்பிக்கை, விஞ்ஞானபூர்வ ஆதாரங்கள் இல்லாவிடினும், மனிதனிடையே ஊன்றியது. பலப்பல அணிகலன்களாக அவை உருவெடுத்து அணிவகுப்பதும் இந்த காரணத்தினால்தான்.

இவைகளில் முத்தும் பவளமும் உயிரினத்திலிருந்து உருவானதால் மென்மையானவை. அவைகளை உருமாற்றம் செய்ய இயலாது. வைரம் மிகவும் கடினமானதால் பட்டைதீட்டி மெருகேற்றி பளச்சிடவைக்க மட்டுமே முடிகிறது. மற்றவை [வைடூரியம், மாணிக்கம், நீலம், மரகதம், புஷ்பராகம், கோமேதகம்] படிகவகையை (crystal structure) சேர்ந்ததாலும் ஓரளவுக்கு கடினமானதாலும், நுணுக்கமான அணிகலங்களயும், உருவச்சிலைகளையும் வடிவமைக்கமுடிகிறது.

இவைகள் பெறிய கற்களாக கிடைப்பது அறிது. அதிலும் மாசின்றி (impurity as inclusions) கிடைப்பது அறிதிலும் அறிது. இந்த மாசு அவைகளின் ஒளிர்வை குறைப்பது மட்டுமன்றி கண்களுக்கு தனியாக வெளிப்படுவதால் மதிப்பை பெருமளவும் குறைக்கின்றன.

நவரத்னங்கள் எடையை பொருத்தே மதிப்பிடப்படுகின்றன. ஆயினும் வைரம் அறிதாகவே கிடைப்பதால் அதன் மதிப்பு மிகவும் அதிகம். மாசில்லாத பெரிய வைரங்களுக்கு மதிப்பு பன்மடங்கு அதிகரிக்கிறது. தென்அமெரிக்காவில் 1905இல் கண்டெடுக்கப்பட்ட, சுமார் 600 கிராம் (3100 கேரட்) எடை கொண்ட கல்லினன் (Cullilan) வைரம்தான் இது நாள் வரை உலகிலேயே கிடைத்த மிகப்பெரிய கச்சா வைரம். இது பல துண்டுகளாக்கப்பட்டு அவைகள் பட்டை தீட்டப்பட்டன. அதில் உருவாகிய பெரியதுண்டுதான் ஸ்டார் ஆப் அமெரிக்கா-1 (Star of America-1)என அறியப்படும் 106 கிராம் (530 கேரட்) கொண்ட வைரம். இதுதான் இன்றைய நாள்வரை உலகிலேயே உள்ள மிகப்பெரிய பட்டை தீட்டிய வைரம்!

வைரங்களை பட்டை தீட்டி மணிமகுடங்களிலும் அரசசிம்மாசனங்களிலும் பதிக்கப்படுவது அந்நாட்களில் மிகவும் பெருமையாக கருதப்பட்டது. கோஹினூர் வைரத்தின் கதையை அறியாதோரும் உண்டோ?

மற்ற படிகவகை வண்ணக்கற்களை கட்டிடங்களின் அழகை கூட்டுவதற்கு பதிப்பது வழக்கத்தில் இருந்தது. ராஜபுதன, மொகலாய அரண்மனைகளில் இந்தபயன்பாடுகளை வெகுவாக காணலாம். ஐரோப்பிய தேவாலயங்களை இவை மெருகேற்றின. ஆசிய மசூதிகளும் இதற்கு விதிவிலக்கல்ல.

சிடி பேலஸ், உதய்பூர், ராஜஸ்தான்

ஆனாலும் தெய்வங்களின் சிலைகளை இவ்வகை கற்களில் வடிவமைக்கும் ஆவல் தென்னிந்திய அரசர்களுக்கு ஏன் ஏற்பட்டதோ தெரியவில்லை. 9 ஆம் நூற்றண்டிலேயே கருங்கல் (granite), மண்கல் (sandstone), மாக்கல் (soap stone), சுண்ணாம்புக்கல் (limestone), பளிங்குக்கல் (marble) போன்ற வெவ்வேறு கடினத்தன்மை கொண்ட கற்சிலைகளை வடிக்கும் கலைஞர்கள் தென்னாட்டில் அதிகம் இருந்ததால் அந்த கலை நன்கு முதிர்ந்திருந்தது. ஜைனர்களின் கோயில்களும் பேலூர் ஹலபேடு இந்து கோயில்களும், பாண்டிய, பல்லவர் கால சிற்பங்களும், மகாபலிபுரம், காஞ்சி கைலாதநாதர் போன்ற பலப்பல குகை கோயில்களும் இதற்கு சாட்சிகளாகும். இந்த காரணத்தால், சிறிது கடினமான ரத்தினக்கற்களிலிருந்தும் சிலை வடிக்கும், அந்த மன்னர்களின் ஆர்வமும் நிறைவேறியது. இவ்வகை சிற்பங்கள் பெரும்பாலும் 15, 16ஆம் நூற்றாண்டுகளில் வடிக்கப்பட்டிருக்கலாம். எளிதான லிங்க வடிவங்கள் முதல் நுணுக்கமான விக்ரஹங்கள் வரை தெய்வ வடிவங்களை தமிழகத்தில் பல கோயில்களிலும் காணலாம்.

இராமநாதபுரம் அருகே அமைந்திருக்கும் உத்திரகோசமங்கை கோயிலில் உள்ள மரகத பாறையிலிருந்து உருவாக்கப்பட்ட நடராஜர்சிலை, இந்த வகையில் ஒன்றுதான். ஐந்தரை அடி உயர தில்லை கூத்தனை, ஒன்றரை அடி உயர பீடத்துடன் “ராஜ கோலத்தில்” மிகவும் நுணுக்கமாக, திருக்கரங்களில் உள்ள நரம்பு தெரியும் அளவிற்கு வடித்தார், சித்தர் சண்முக வடிவேலர் என்ற ஒரு சிற்பி. பால் அபிஷேகத்தின் போது இந்த வேலைப்பாடுகள் வெளிப்படும். ஆடல்கூத்தனின் வடிவத்தை உருவமைக்க எப்படிப்பட்ட கருவிகளை எல்லாம் உபயோகப்படுத்தியிருக்க வேண்டும் என வியப்பதில் விந்தை ஒன்றும் இல்லை! ஒரு குறைபாடு உண்டாயிடினும் முழு வேலைப்பாடும் வீணன்றோ? இந்த சிலை இராமனாதபுர மன்னன் சேதுபதிகாலத்தில் 16, 17 ஆம் நூற்றாண்டு காலகட்டங்களில் அமைக்கப்பட்டதாக அறியப்படுகிறது.

நடராஜர்சிலை, உத்திரகோசமங்கை, தமிழ்நாடு

மதுரை மீனாட்சி சிவையும் மரகத்தில் ஆனதுதான் (சுமார் ஐந்தடி உயரம்). வைதீஸ்வரன்கோயிலில் சிவலிங்கம் மரகதம். தில்லையில் உள்ள நடராஜர் (ரத்தினசபாபதி) சிலை மாணிக்க கல்லில் (சுமார் ஒரு அடி உயரம்) வடிக்கப்பட்டது, ரத்தினசபாபதியின் தீபாராதனையின் போது, ஆடலரசனை தீப்பிழம்பாக காண்பது ஒரு பேரின்பம்தான்.

இந்த வகையைச்சார்ந்த மற்ற சிலைகளைப்பற்றிய விபரங்கள் இணையத்தில் கிடைக்கவில்லை. மேலும் வைடூரியம், நீலம், புஷ்பராகம், கோமேதகம் ஆகிய வகை கற்களிலான தெய்வச்சிலைகள் இருப்பதாகவும் தெரியவில்லை.

இவ்வகை நவரத்தின கல் சிலைகள் மூலவிக்ரகங்களாக இருந்தாலும் அபிஷேகங்கள் குறைந்த அளவில்தான் நடத்தப்படுகின்றன. உத்திரகோசமங்கையில் வருடத்திற்கு ஒருமுறை மார்கழி திருவாதிரையில்தான் அபிஷேகம். மற்ற நாட்களில் சந்தன காப்பு மட்டும்தான்.

உத்திரகோசமங்கையில் அபிஷேகம்

பலநூற்றாண்டுகாளாக பின்னமில்லாமல் இந்த சிலைகள் காக்கப்படுவதற்கு இதுவும் ஒரு முக்கிய காரணம்.

நவரத்தின கற்களின் சக்தியும் தெய்வத்தின் அருளும் ஒருமித்து கிடைத்தால் வாழ்வில் மகிழ்ச்சிக்கு குறைவும் உண்டோ? கல்லிலே கலை வண்ணமும் தெய்வ வடிவமும் ஒருங்கிணைத்த கலைஞனை இந்த தருணத்தில் வாழ்த்தி வணங்குவோம்.

வஞ்ச புகழ்ச்சியில் இது ஒரு உச்சம்

கோயில்களுக்கு சென்று இறைவனிடம் நோய்தீர வேண்டுபவர் யாரில்லை? ஆனால் இறைவனுக்கு அந்த சக்தி இல்லை என கவி காளமேகத்தினால் மட்டுமே சாதிக்க முடியும்! அவரின் கூற்றுப்படி தன் குடும்பத்தினரையே குணப்படுத்த இயலாத அவனால் மற்றவரை எப்படி குணப்படுத்த முடியம்! அவரின் சந்தேகத்துக்கான காரணங்களை கோடிட்டு காட்டி இயற்றிய அந்த பாடல் இதோ!

வாதக்காலாம் தமக்கு மைத்துனருக்கு நீரிழிவாம் போதப் பெருவயிறாம் புத்திரர்க்கு — மாதரையில் வந்தவினை தீர்க்க வகையறியான் வேளூரான் எந்தவினை தீர்த்தான் இவன்?

நடனடமாடுவதால் தமக்கே காலில் வாதம், மைத்துனருக்கோ நீரிழிவால் படுக்கை, மைந்தன் கணபதிக்கு பெருத்த வயிறு, இப்படி தன் குடும்பத்தனரின் நோயையே தீர்க்கமுடியாதவனா என் வினையைத்தீர்க்கப்போகிறான்? ஈசனை எப்படித்தான் ஏளனம் செய்யகிறார் இந்த காளமேகம். இப்படி ஏகத்துக்கும் வந்திப்பதால் இறைவன் பயந்து வந்து தம்மை அருளுவான் என்பது இவர் எண்ணமோ?

இதே தோரணையில், ஈசனை பார்த்து ‘ஐயோ உனக்கு தாயும் இல்லை தந்தையும் இல்லை; நீ ஒரு அனாதை; அதனால் நீ பட்ட கஷ்டங்கள்தான் எத்தனை; பாவமய்யா நீர்’ என ஈசனை பரிதாபத்துடன் கேட்பதாக கவிஞர் பொன்னையா பிள்ளை இயற்றியது கீழ் வரும் பாடல்! தாய் தந்தை இல்லாமல், தானே துன்பப்படும் அவன் எப்படி தன்னைக்காக்க முடியும் என சந்தேகிக்கிறாரோ இவர் என்று தோன்றுகிறது!

தந்தை தாய் இருந்தால் உலகத்தில் உமக்கிந்த தாழ்வெல்லாம் வருமோ அய்யா பெற்ற (தந்தை தாய்)

அந்தமிகுந்த ஸ்ரீ அம்பலவாணரே அருமையுடனே பெற்று பெருமையுடன் வளர்த்த (தந்தை தாய்)

கல்லால் ஒருவன் அடிக்க உடல் சிலிர்க்க காலில் செருப்பால் ஒரு வேடன் வந்தே உதைக்க வில்லால் ஒருவன் அடிக்க காண்டீபம் என்னும் வில்லால் ஒருவன் அடிக்க கூசாமல் ஒருவன் கை கோடாலியால் வெட்ட கூட்டத்தில் ஒருவன் பித்தா பேயா என திட்ட வீசி மதுரை மாறன் பிரம்பால் அடிக்க அந்த வேளை யாரை நினைந்தீரோ அய்யா பெற்ற (தந்தை தாய்)

உலகில் எல்லா உயிருக்கும் அம்மையாகவும் அப்பனாகவும் இருக்கும் இந்த ஈசனையே இப்படி பாடுவதற்கு எவ்வளவு தைரியம் வேண்டும் இந்த கவிக்கு?

பள்ளிகொண்ட பெருமாளை அருணாசல கவிராயர் பாடிய கீழ் வரும் பாடலும் இதே வகையை சேர்ந்ததுதான். ஏன் இப்படி களைத்து படுத்துக்கொண்டிருக்கிறார் என்பதற்கு காரணங்கள் பல காட்டும் இவர், ஓய்வில் இருக்கும் பெருமாள் தம்மை காப்பாரோ என சந்தேக்கிறாரோ என தோன்றுகிறது!

ஏன் பள்ளீ கொண்டீரய்யா? ஸ்ரீ ரங்கனாதரே நீர்
(ஏன்)

ஆம்பல் பூத்த சய பருவத மடுவிலே-அவதரித்த இரண்டாற்று நடுவிலே
(ஏன்)

கௌசிகன் சொல் குறித்ததர்க்கோ? அரக்கி குலையில் அம்பு எறிந்த்ததர்க்கோ?
ஈசன் வில்லை முறித்ததர்க்கோ? பரசுராமனுரம் பரித்ததர்க்கோ?
மாசில்லாத மிதிலேசன் பெண்ணுடனே வழி நடந்த இளைப்போ?
தூசில்லாத குஹனோடத்திலே கங்கை துறை கடந்த இளைப்போ?
மீசுரமாம் சித்ரகூட சிகரத்தின் மிசை கிடந்த இளைப்போ?
காசினிமேல் மாரீசனோடிய கதி தொடர்ந்த இளைப்போ?
ஓடிக்களைத்தோ தேவியை தேடி இளைத்தோ? மரங்கள் ஏழும் துளைத்தோ?
கடலை கட்டி வளைத்தோ? இலங்கை என்னும் காவல் மாநகரை இடித்த வருத்தமோ?
ராவணாதிகளை முடித்த வருத்தமோ?
(ஏன்)

மதுரையிலே வரும் களையோ? முதலை வாய் மகனைத்தரும் களையோ?
எதிர் எருதை பெருங்களையோ? கன்றை எடுத்தெரிந்த பெரும் களையோ?
புதுமை ஆன முலையுண்டு பேயின் உயிர் போக்கி அலுத்தீரோ?
அதிர ஓடிவரும் குருவி வாயை இரண்டாக்கி அலுத்தீரோ?
துதி செய் ஆயர்களை காக்க வேண்டி மலை தூக்கி அலுத்தீரோ?
ஜதி செய் காலினால் காளிங்கன் மணிமுடி தாக்கி அலுத்தீரோ?
மருதம் சாய்த்தோ? ஆடு மாடுகள் மேய்த்தோ?சகடுருளை தேய்தோ? கஞ்சன் உயிரை மாய்த்தோ?
அர்ஜுனனுக்காய் சாரதியாய் தேர் விடுத்த வருத்தமோ?
போரிலே சக்ரம் எடுத்த வருத்தமோ? (ஏன்)

படி தனிலே மெத்தவும் நானே உம்மை பரம் எனவே அடுத்தேனே
அடிமை கொள்வீர் என்னைத்தானே செம்பொன் அணி அரங்கப்பெருமாளே!
ததம் உரைந்த கரும் பாறை சாபமது தடுத்து ரக்ஷித்தீரே!
விட ஒண்ணாத காகாசுரனுக்கொரு கண் விடுத்து ரக்ஷித்தீரே!
கொடுமை கொண்டழுத த்ரௌபதைக்குத் துகில் கொடுட்த்து ரக்ஷித்தீரே!மடுவில் ஆனை முன் ஓடி முதலையை மடித்து ரக்ஷித்தீரே அதுபோல்
வாரும் க்ருபை கண்ணாலே பாரும் மனக்கவலை தீரும்
நினைத்த வரம் தாரும் தாரும் என் சாமி வக்ஷமேவும்
மஹாலஷ்மியுடன் பெரும் பஷமாக என்னை ரஷிக்க எழுந்திரும்

உலகையே காக்கும் கடவுள் ஓய்வெடுக்கிறார் என்பதை சாதித்து விட்டு யாரிடம் தஞ்சமடைய உத்தேசித்திருக்கிறாரோ இந்த அருணாசல கவிராயர் ?

கவிகள் இப்படி சளைக்காமல் ஒருவரை ஒருவர் விஞ்சும் வண்ணம் இறைவனை வந்தித்து வஞ்சப்புகழ்ச்சி வகையில் அமைத்த இந்த பாடல்களின் நயங்களை அனுபவிப்பதுடன், கவிக்குயில்கள் குரலில் கேட்டு சுவைப்பதும் ஒரு இன்பம்தானே?

Is Arrogance, a Corollary of Power and Wealth?

What kind of a person is PC, the once powerful and stinkingly wealthy, ex-minister Palanichami Chidambaram? This question was answered by one in Quora as follows: You may take it with a pinch of salt!

“Well, I’ll narrate one incident that happened to a friend of mine. My friend once boarded an aircraft and found PC sitting in a business class or executive class seat. So, he goes up to him, smiles broadly, introduces himself, offers his visiting card and says, ‘sir, I also went to the same school as you did.’

How would anybody react in this situation? Anybody would say, ‘oh, is that so, which year were you in’, or at least, ‘oh, really? that’s nice, thank you’, or even, ‘oh? thank you’. The conversation would have ended there.

Our man, PC, didn’t. He looked my friend in the eye with obvious disgust and said, “So?” and returned—RETURNED—the visiting card. He did not even accept the card. It was like slapping my friend on his face. My friend was deeply hurt by this lack of courtesy. He just went to his seat in the aircraft, feeling ‘why did I even have to talk to this man?’

Well, this is only one of the many of such examples. Whatever else he is, Palaniappan Chidambaram is a very, very, very mean person.”

I could recount one such experience myself. A lady was sitting in the window and I was in the aisle while travelling in an afternoon Chennai-Delhi flight. Even before everyone could settle down, the lady demanded a news paper in front of me in the pouch with such impoliteness, that would normally force me to retort strongly! But even before I could decide how to respond, the passenger sitting between us plucked it out and handed over to her! On alighting I saw she was received by uniformed men and realised She was ‘Nalini Chidambaram’! At that time PC was a powerful cabinet minister in the UPA government!

These crooks believe they are straight from Mars and fate has only forced them to live amidst us, the savage mortals! Modesty is never in their lexicon! But, still there are also many in the world, who despite being rich and wealthy, are socially humble, live a modest and philanthropic life.

Warren Buffett, the Chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, for example, with a Net worth of about $89 billion, continues to reside in the 50-year-old home he bought for $31,500 in Omaha, Nebraska. He drives a Cadillac that costs just $45,000. He has a charitable bent of mind, having donated billions to charitable organizations. There are many many more such in the west!

Narayana murthy, Azim Premji and Tata are a few others living nearby without vulgar display of power and show off wealth! I have seen Murthys visiting Sai temple in Bangalore without much fanfare. These are examples of different kinds: we have choices to emulate!

When being told that her French subjects had no bread, Marie-Antoinette (bride of France’s King Louis XVI) sniffed, “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche”—“Let them eat cake.”

Yes, Power breeds arrogance in some!

Future shock

Things are changing faster than one can imagine! Most of what was predicted by Alwin Toffler in ‘Future Shock’ and Noah Harari’s ‘21 lessens for the 21st century’ could even be overwhelmed!

Take for example, the automobile industry: Electric cars will become mainstream by about 2030. Smart major auto manufacturers have already earmarked money to start building new plants that only build electric cars. Most traditional car companies will doubtless become bankrupt. They will try the evolutionary approach and just build a better car, while tech companies (Tesla, Apple, Google) will do the revolutionary approach and build a computer on wheels. Look at what Volvo is doing right now; no more internal combustion engines in their vehicles starting with 2019 models, using all electric or hybrid only, with the intent of phasing out hybrid models. Many engineers from Volkswagen and Audi are completely terrified of Tesla and they should be. Look at all these auto majors are already offering electric vehicles. That was unheard of only a few years ago.

Auto repair shops will disappear. A petrol/diesel engine has 20,000 individual parts while an electrical motor has just 20. Electric cars are sold with lifetime guarantees and are only repaired by dealers. It takes only 10 minutes to remove and replace an electric motor. Faulty electric motors are not repaired in the dealership but are sent to a regional repair shop that repairs them with robots. Your electric motor malfunction light goes on, so you drive up to what looks like a car wash, and your car is towed through while you have a cup of coffee and out comes your car with a new electric motor!

Petrol pumps will soon go away. Street corners will have meters that dispense electricity. Companies will install electrical recharging stations; in fact, they’ve already started in the developed world.

Only in 2018 the first self-driving cars appeared. In the next 2 years, the entire industry got disrupted. You won’t want to own a car anymore as you will call a car with your phone, it will show up at your location and drive you to your destination.

The very young children of today will never get a driver’s license and will never own a car. This will change our cities, because we will need 90-95% fewer cars. We can transform former parking spaces into green parks.

About 1.2 million people die each year in car accidents worldwide including distracted or drunk driving. We now have one accident every 60,000 miles; with autonomous driving that will drop to 1 accident in 6 million miles. That will save a million lives plus worldwide each year. Insurance companies will have massive trouble because, without accidents, the costs will become cheaper. Their car insurance business model will disappear.

Cities will be less noisy because all new cars will run on electricity. Cities will have much cleaner air as well. Since automobile industry is the energy guzzler, there would be sea change in the energy industry:

Electricity will soon become incredibly cheap and clean. Solar production has been on an exponential curve for 30 years, but you can now see the burgeoning impact. And it’s just getting ramped up. Homes will produce and store more electrical energy during the day and then they use and will sell it back to the grid. The grid stores it and dispenses it to industries that are high electricity users. Has anybody seen the Tesla roof? Fossil energy companies are desperately trying to limit access to the grid to prevent competition from home solar installations, but that simply cannot continue – technology will take care of that strategy.

Coal industries will go away. Gasoline/oil companies will go away. Drilling for oil will stop. They may have to survive on petrochemical industries. So OPEC can’t dictate terms. The middle-east is in trouble.

Children born today would be surprised to know the present ‘chaotic world’ when they grow up – Energy and automobile sector is just one of them. There are many more to come in the health and entertainment industries. Welcome to Tomorrow.